Attempt to Declare a Pet as a Tax Dependent: A Legal Battle
Many of us have glanced at an ever-growing pile of vet bills, grooming expenses, daycare fees, and premium pet food receipts and pondered, “Isn't my pet just like a dependent?”
This sentiment is not isolated, as highlighted by a legal maneuver from New York attorney Amanda Reynolds in December 2025. Reynolds initiated a lawsuit against the IRS, arguing for the recognition of her eight-year-old golden retriever, Finnegan, as a legitimate dependent under federal tax codes.
The case, both peculiar and intriguing, strikes at a common taxpayer inquiry: Are pet expenses ever deductible? And if not, why?
Below, we delve into the case details, explain the pertinent tax laws, and explore situations where the IRS acknowledges tax benefits related to animals.
The Novel Lawsuit: Arguing a Dog Meets Dependency Criteria
Reynolds’ legal complaint asserts that Finnegan satisfies the IRS dependency criteria, citing:
- Constant residence with the owner
- Lack of personal income
- Over half of Finnegan’s support is provided by Reynolds, with expenses surpassing $5,000 annually covering food, medical care, and daycare.
A news report featuring the lawsuit quotes Reynolds making an emotional argument: "For all practical purposes, Finnegan is akin to a daughter, definitely a ‘dependent.’”
Reynolds further posits constitutional objections, indicating the current rules inequitably categorize dependents based on “species” (an Equal Protection argument) and suggest the absence of tax recognition reciprocates an illicit “taking” (a Fifth Amendment argument).
Current Status of the Case
Presently before the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, the case is largely stagnant as the discovery phase is stayed while the IRS formulates a dismissal motion.
The court order labels the proceedings a “novel but pressing inquiry” concerning the eligibility of pets as tax code “dependents,” yet emphasizes steep challenges, indicating the claims appear “uncompelling on their face” and unlikely to withstand the dismissal motion.
In essence, the lawsuit stands, draws interest, but is met with judicial skepticism regarding its potential triumph.
Why Pets Aren’t Eligible as Federal Tax Dependents
The primary conflict for this lawsuit lies in the definition of dependents under tax law as “individuals.”
As per Internal Revenue Code Section 152, dependents are classified as a “qualifying child” or a “qualifying relative,” centering on the term “individual” in historic reference to human beings.
This is why IRS forms contain no provision for listing pets as dependents. Dependents must possess Social Security numbers or alternative taxpayer identification numbers, and the tax benefits tied to dependents are constructed around human familial and household dynamics.
While Reynolds argues that Finnegan fulfills the functional dependency test (residing with and financially supported by her), the tax code fundamentally doesn’t recognize animals as dependent “individuals.”
Existing Tax Benefits for Animals
Generally, routine pet expenses are non-deductible; however, crucial exceptions do exist. Readers will appreciate this actionable guidance.
1) Medical Deductions for Service Animals
If an animal is a designated service animal aiding with a disability, applicable costs may count as medical expenses if you opt to itemize deductions.
The IRS specifies that medical expenses may qualify for deductions, provided they surpass the AGI threshold. Consequently, expenses tied to acquiring, training, and maintaining service animals are recognized as medical expenses related directly to medical care.
Critical Distinction: Emotional support animals generally do not classify as service animals federally; service animals require specific task-training related to a disability.
2) Business Expenses for Working Animals
Under certain conditions, a pet can be deemed part of a recognized business operation—illustratively:
- Guard dogs protecting business premises, or
- Animals facilitating pest control within a business environment.
In these instances, related ongoing expenses may qualify as ordinary and necessary business costs. Accurate documentation and genuine business intent are fundamental.
Your source document highlights this as one of the circumscribed categories in which the IRS permits animal-associated tax reliefs.
3) Charitable Deductions Through Foster Animal Care
Taxpayers fostering animals for certified organizations may occasionally deduct certain unreimbursed costs as charitable donations—adhering to specific rules and maintaining records.
Taxpayer Bottom Line
This lawsuit resonates due to its relatable core: pets constitute family for countless Americans, and the associated costs are substantial. However, tax law structures around statutory definitions, not emotions.
As of now:
- You cannot claim pets as dependents on federal tax returns.
- Routine pet costs (daily food, standard grooming, regular veterinary care) are primarily personal and exempt from deduction.
- Certain animal-related expenses may qualify for deductions under limited circumstances—like service animals, designated business animals, and occasionally, foster-related charitable dedications.
The Reynolds case remains a pertinent one to observe—not due to experts predicting the IRS issuing dependent IDs for pets but because it showcases how fundamentally tax policy delineates between “family” and “property.”
Finally, it serves as a key reminder: before presuming something deductible, verify IRS recognition of such claims.
Want tax & accounting tips and insights?
Sign up for our newsletter.