Indiana's Cigarette Tax Surge: Lessons from the Past

Recently, Indiana’s substantial cigarette tax increase reflects not only a fiscal strategy but also a nod to the state’s historical bootlegging activities. As Indiana hikes its per-pack prices, legislators are implementing stringent penalties reminiscent of the Prohibition-era crackdown on moonshiners and illicit traders.

Today, as in the 1930s, the focus shifts from hidden operations to modern interstates and marketplaces, where tax-savvy consumers sidestep duties by crossing state lines. Historical parallels can be drawn from states like Kentucky and Tennessee. Kentucky, with its minimal cigarette tax of 10 cents per pack versus Indiana’s $1, has been a smuggling hotspot, echoing the trade routes of yesteryear.

However, the narrative is more complex than mere illicit trades. The 2018 Tobacconomics brief from Johns Hopkins highlights the fiscal effects of cigarette tax hikes in states like Indiana. Post-2007, following a marked increase from 55¢ to 99.5¢ per pack, Indiana noted a 43% revenue surge despite neighboring states experiencing declines, affirming net revenue growth even with smuggling concerns.

Strengthening Enforcement Measures

Effective July 1st, Indiana's cigarette tax will more than double, bolstered by enhanced enforcement mechanisms:

Criminalizing large-scale out-of-state purchases, designating high-volume offenders as felons.
Intensified task forces—Excise and state police included—focus on monitoring transit points and storage facilities.
Random audits targeting wholesalers and retailers to spot counterfeit tax stamps.
Projected fiscal gains: $290 million annually, earmarked primarily for public health upgrades.

The Border Dilemma

Indiana's geographic positioning, adjacent to low-tax states like Kentucky, exacerbates the smuggling challenge. A Tax Foundation report lists Indiana among high-risk states for increased cigarette smuggling post-tax rise, highlighting significant potential for tax evasion and unauthorized sales across borders.

Ohio is another strategic point, with its lower cigarette tax and dense road network. According to the 2024 Mackinac Center study, roughly 12% of cigarettes consumed in Indiana may originate from such out-of-state purchases following the tax adjustment.

Learning from Illinois & New York

Illinois:

Illinois implemented a substantial tax increase, which now constitutes 45% of wholesale prices, intensifying smuggling risks.
About 30% of cigarettes there are allegedly smuggled, prompting the state to impose severe fines—$20–$25 per unstamped pack beyond nine, targeting bulk shipments post-2019’s tax jump.

New York:

Facing one of the highest combined state-municipal taxes, New York's smuggling exceeds 50%, peaking at 61% post a recent $1-per-pack rise.
The state's Tax Enforcement Office and the Albany-based ATF enforce stringent felony trafficking laws, with Class D/E felonies for those possessing 10,000+ cigarettes.

Historical Insight into Indiana's Bootlegging Roots

Indiana's history is rich with bootlegging narratives, particularly during Prohibition, when the state was a hub for moonshine production, particularly in rural counties such as Lawrence and Dubois. These clandestine activities were carried out on covert “Whiskey Roads.”

The methods have transformed—contraband has shifted from liquor to cigarettes—but exploitation of legal loopholes remains. Former Indiana Excise officer John Halverson notes, “Where there were once barn-hidden stills, there are now car-trunk-filled cartons.”

Public Health Perspective or Policy Gamble?

While critics view increased smuggling as a policy setback, public health proponents highlight the broader benefits. Elevated tobacco costs lead to smoking reductions, particularly among youth and low-income demographics, as noted by Mike Seilback of the American Lung Association to The Indiana Capital Chronicle.

Even amidst 10–30% smuggling, research indicates that states like Indiana can experience significant revenue augmentation from tax hikes, conditional on effective enforcement. The 2007 experience—marked by a 41% sales decline but a 43% revenue rise—demonstrates this potential.

Will Indiana's Strategy Pay Off?

Indiana is wagering substantial gains on this initiative. However, success will depend on balancing revenue projections with practical enforcement. Can small retailers adjust? Will modern equivalents of moonshiners—swift and sly—evade capture? Only time will provide answers, but for now, Indiana’s roads echo with a familiar spirit, stirring up memories of a storied past filled with high stakes and fast-paced escapades.

Share this article...

Facebook

Twitter WhatsApp LinkedIn Pinterest Pocket Reddit Email

Want tax & accounting tips and insights?

I confirm this is a service inquiry and not an advertising message or solicitation. By clicking “Submit”, I acknowledge and agree to the creation of an account and to the and .